Legal Opinion

Kolinske v. Lubbers

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 17, 1983No. 82-1203PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge TAMM.

TAMM, Circuit Judge:

Appellee Raymond Kolinske brought suit in district court alleging that the defendant International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (“UAW”) violated his constitutional rights and breached its duty of fair representation when it refused to pay Kolinske strike benefits because he refused to participate in any strike activities except to honor the picket line. The district court granted appellee summary judgment, holding that the UAW’s eligibility rules for strike benefits,…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Thanh Vong Hoai v. Thanh Van VoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  2. Village of Bensenville v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
  3. William R. Freeman v. Local Union No. 135 Chauffeurs, Teamsters, Warehousemen and HelpersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Charles O'Hara and Jerry Howard v. District No. 1-Pcd, Meba, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  5. Robert A. Miller v. Air Line Pilots AssociationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API