United States v. Temple
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, District Judge.
This action is one by the Government to recover damages for several transactions in which it claims it has been defrauded by defendant Paul Temple. On the basis of its complaint and one other document which will be discussed later, the Government has moved for a summary judgment in its favor.
The first affirmative defense asserted by the answer is that the complaint is barred by the Statute of limitations. *120Consideration of this defense requires ah examination of the various Counts of the complaint. Counts I and II set forth two occasions on which Temple allegedly…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Rex Trailer Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Bridges v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. SillimanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Marzani v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
- Marzani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Federal Savings & Loan Ins. Corporation v. SzarabajkaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1971
- United States v. BNP Paribas SADistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
- Household Finance Corp. v. SuhrAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963
- United States v. DinersteinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1964