Legal Opinion

United States v. Dinerstein

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided February 10, 1964No. Civ. No. 20396PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, District Judge.

Plaintiff in 1960 sued a government contractor under Section 19 of the Contract Settlement Act of 1944 (41 U. S.C.A. § 119) alleging that partial and final payments that it had made on certain terminated contracts in 1946 and 1947 resulted from the contractor’s presenting invoices and certificates that were false in stating the costs and progress of the work, and resulted from the contractor’s concealing from plaintiff the existence of cost records that would have disclosed to plaintiff the true costs. The same facts are realleged as a common law fraud. In separate…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Rex Trailer Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. United States v. HoughamSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. United States v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Leo C. Gonzales v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Luther v. Consolidated Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1989
  2. United States v. DinersteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  3. United States v. RapoportDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  4. United States v. DinersteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API