Legal Opinion

State v. Key

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 16, 1958No. 362PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The evidence made out a case for the jury. Motions for a directed verdict were properly denied. The evidence of the mother of the prosecuting witness was admissible for purpose of corroboration.

The defendant’s assignment of error No. 10 involves the following part of the court’s charge:

“If you find from the evidence and beyond a reasonable doubt that Robert Key had sexual intercourse with this girl, . . . about the first of November, or thereabouts, and within a reasonable period of gestation, that is, within approximately seven, eight, or nine months and nine and a half or ten months prior…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. . ForteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Searcy Ex Rel. Schiro v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. HickmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. CampCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API