Legal Opinion

R. F. Baker Co., Inc. v. P. Ballantine Sons

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 8, 1941PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

The plaintiff had the exclusive agency for the products of the defendant in Danbury and vicinity from February to September, 1934. The agency was then revoked. Thereupon the plaintiff brought an action against the defendant, claiming damages for breach of contract in the second count and on a quantum meruit basis in the third. The first count was withdrawn. The jury rendered a general verdict for the plaintiff which the trial court set aside.

The jury could reasonably have found the relationship between the parties to have been as follows, considering the evidence in its aspect most favorable…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schleicher v. SchleicherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  2. Collins v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  3. Kearns v. AndreeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  4. Alfred M. Best Co., Inc. v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  5. Frisbie v. SchintoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hess v. Dumouchel Paper Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  2. Shattuck v. Precision-Toyota, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. TinsleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. Lengel v. New Haven Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  5. Rosenblatt v. BermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API