Legal Opinion
Frisbie v. Schinto
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 5, 1935PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
The trial court in setting aside the verdict stated three grounds for doing so, namely: that the testimony of one of the plaintiff’s witnesses was false and unworthy of belief; that the charge was erroneous in that it failed to contain reference to a certain statute claimed to be essential to a proper consideration of the issues, and was further erroneous in submitting the case to the jury on the possible theory of supervening negligence when the conditions for its operation did not appear in the evidence.
The memorandum of decision contains a long review of the testimony of plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ziman v. WhitleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Aaronson v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Fine v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
- Worth v. DunnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Gonchar v. KelsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Kinderavich v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Novak v. AndersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Busko v. DeFilippoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Sapiente v. WaltuchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Fleischer v. KregelsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.