Legal Opinion
Richard Faye Auman, Sr. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 7, 1995No. 94-1937PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.
Richard Faye Auman, Sr., appeals from the district court’s 1 denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Auman claims that the district court should not have sentenced him as a career offender and that, in so doing, it erroneously classified his 1985 conviction for possession of a controlled substance as a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 (Nov.1994), based on his simultaneous possession of firearms. Auman also claims ineffective assistance of counsel. The district court rejected both arguments. We affirm.
In 1989, Auman pled guilty to possession of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Knight v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Phillip D. Scott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. James A. EssigCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Thomas John MaybeckCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- United States v. Michael J. Mikalajunas, United States of America v. Craig E. Largent, United States of America v. Michael J. MikalajunasCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Paul Kreutzer v. Michael S. Bowersox, Warden, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Sun Bear v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. George Lloyd PregentCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Monte Allen ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.