Legal Opinion

Strevig v. Seibert

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Adams County

Decided December 18, 1990No. 88-S-957 of 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

SPICER, P.J.,

In this medical malpractice suit, we are asked to preliminarily determine the admissibility of evidence relating to the doctor’s prior treatment of plaintiff. Following a pretrial conference in which the evidence was discussed, plaintiff filed a formal offer of proof and defendant entered a motion in limine to exclude the evidence.

For purposes of this rule, the court accepts as true assertions made both in the offer and in plaintiff’s brief. For example, we assume that plaintiff will be able to prove that certain side effects of medicines involved in this case were known by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Majdic v. Cincinnati MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Henderson v. National Drug Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Parrish v. ClarkSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  4. Carter v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Adams v. DunnOregon Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API