Legal Opinion

Carter v. United States Steel Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1990No. 1652 and 1688PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, President Judge:

This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, granting United States Steel Corporation’s (hereinafter USX) motion for a new trial, and denying its motion for judgment non obstante veredicto. We affirm.

In 1984, USX maintained and partially operated a steel manufacturing plant, known as the Carrie Furnace Works, along the eastern bank of the Monongahela River in the borough of Swissvale. Between December of 1983 and June of 1984, Andrew Carter, a fourteen year-old resident of Swissvale, frequently trespassed with his friends,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Ingrassia Const. Co., Inc. v. WalshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Stevenson v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Bialek v. Pittsburgh Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. Penske Truck Leasing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Carter v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Kalenevitch v. FingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Nigro v. Remington Arms Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Long v. ManzoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API