Legal Opinion

Parrish v. Clark

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 9, 1933PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a writ of error taken to a judgment at law awarding plaintiff below damages for injuries alleged to have been negligently inflicted upon her in defendant's hospital.

The declaration sounded both in tort and contract, but the nature of the action is largely immaterial on the question of whether or not the judgment should be reversed on the sole ground that liability is not shown by the evidence.

The gist of the cause of action was the asserted right to recover damages for personal injuries from the operator and proprietor of the Victoria Hospital at Miami, the allegations of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Flint & Walling Manufacturing Co. v. BeckettIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Banfield Et Ux. v. Addington Et Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  4. Gitzhoffen v. Sisters of Holy Cross Hospital Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Jennings v. Pope, Etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. HechlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Merchants Transportation Co. v. DanielSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  3. Stuart Circle Hospital Corp. v. CurrySupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
  4. Sáez v. Municipio de PonceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
  5. Zostautas v. St. Anthony De Padua HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1961

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API