Parmenter v. Douglass Tank Co.

Opinion by

THREADGILL, C.

Plaintiffs in error were defendants, and defendant in error was plaintiff in the trial court, and the parties will be referred to here as they were there.

The action was based upon an itemized account of «$565.23, showing a credit for ¡8200, and plaintiff obtained judgment for $265.23, and defendants appealed.

The former opinion prepared and handed down in this case treated the account sued on as a verified account. This theory was based upon the attitude of the parties in the briefs and in part upon the record in the case. The petition and amended petition had the…