Legal Opinion

Smith v. Arrow Drilling Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 6, 1942No. 30543PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

This action was commenced in district court by defendants in error against plaintiffs in error to recover a certain sum allegedly due under a written contract for the drilling of an oil and gas well. Defendants below filed their answer and cross-petition charging that the well after completion as a producer was destroyed as a result of plaintiffs’ negligence, and sought judgment as on counterclaim for the resulting damages. Judgment was rendered on the verdict for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal.

Defendants were the owners of an oil and gas leasehold on which was located a well of a depth of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. RoachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Schaff v. CoyleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Texas Co. v. AlredSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. Swarts v. State Ex Rel. CaldwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Crews v. Shell Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Mayor v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  3. Groseclose v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  4. Hedrick v. Commissioner of the Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
  5. Jones v. C. L. Frates & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API