Hutchins ex rel. Hutchins v. Perales
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously modified, on *542the law, by reinstating respondents’ determination terminating AFDC benefits to petitioner’s minor children and, as modified, affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In each of the cases before us, the Commissioner of Social Services suspended the public assistance benefits of the entire household in accordance with the so-called "lump-sum” rule (18 NYCRR 352.29 [h]). The common issue for resolution is whether the Commissioner validly applied the regulation to suspend the benefits of minor children of the household as a consequence of their parents’ receipt of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sutter v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Sutter v. PeralesNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Knapton v. KitchinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Calkins v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by2 opinions
- Moore v. GanimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Queal v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986