Legal Opinion

Sutter v. Perales

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 13, 1984PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: The question presented in plaintiff’s action for a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief is whether the defendant Commissioner of Social Services had sufficiently broad rule-making power to provide by regulation that aid to a home relief recipient who receives “nonrecurring lump sum income” must be suspended until the aggregate of the suspended aid payments equals the lump sum. 11 Plaintiff received a lump-sum Social Security settlement in the amount of $1,320. When she notified the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. John P. v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Bates v. ToiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lovelace v. GrossNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Hoke v. OrtizNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Rice v. PeralesNew York Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Knapton v. KitchinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. Calkins v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API