Sutter v. Perales
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Order modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: The question presented in plaintiff’s action for a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief is whether the defendant Commissioner of Social Services had sufficiently broad rule-making power to provide by regulation that aid to a home relief recipient who receives “nonrecurring lump sum income” must be suspended until the aggregate of the suspended aid payments equals the lump sum. 11 Plaintiff received a lump-sum Social Security settlement in the amount of $1,320. When she notified the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- John P. v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Bates v. ToiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lovelace v. GrossNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Hoke v. OrtizNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Rice v. PeralesNew York Supreme Court · 1993
- Knapton v. KitchinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Calkins v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.