Grant v. Grant
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant, Samuel Grant, from an order of the District Court of Eiee County, Thomas S. Buckham, J., made July 28, 1892, overruling his demurrer to his wife’s complaint for divorce.
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
The order overruling the demurrer to the complaint should be sustained.
I. There is no improper joinder of different causes of action. Facts which would entitle the plaintiff to a limited divorce only may be pleaded with those showing a cause of action for an absolute divorce, and relief in both forms may be sought alternatively. Wagner v. Wagner, 36 Minn. 239, (30 N. W. Rep. 766,) and cases cited.
2. The complaint undoubtedly sets forth two sufficient grounds upon which at least a limited divorce may be granted. One of *182them is that the defendant had continuously compelled the plaintiff to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wagner v. WagnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- First National Bank v. HowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Collins v. LewisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
3Cited by3 opinions
- Martilla v. Quincy Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Armstrong v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Heinze v. HeinzeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909