American Tobacco Co. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
Petitioners, manufacturers of tobacco products, each of whom is a defendant in one or more of eleven lawsuits pending in respondent court, seek a writ of mandate and/or prohibition to compel the lower court to set aside its orders denying petitioners’ motions for judgment on the pleadings in the actions filed by the real parties in interest. As we explain, petitioners are entitled to judgments on the pleadings; accordingly, we shall grant the petition.
Background
The real parties in interest (who, for the sake of simplicity, shall be referred to as plaintiffs) consist of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1972
- California Manufacturers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Myers v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- MacIsaac v. Waste Management Collection & Recycling, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- AILANTO PROPERTIES, INC. v. City of Half Moon BayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- City and County of San Francisco v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1997
- Richards v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.