Legal Opinion
Hayden v. Ford Motor Company
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 15, 1973No. Civ. C 70-24PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
KALBFLEISCH, Senior District Judge.
On March 2, 1973, defendant Ford Motor Company filed a motion
“pursuant to [the] authority of Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, * * * for Judgment on the Pleadings, for the reason that this action has not been brought within the time provided by law * *
A brief in opposition to defendant’s motion was filed on May 7, 1973. Defendant filed a response to the new matters asserted in plaintiff’s brief on May 31, 1973.
A review of the pleadings indicates that the defense of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ruby Humphreys, Administratrix of the Estate of William Orvie Humphreys, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Bomer v. RibicoffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
- Helen Jenkins Kington, Widow of Joe D. Kington, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Buehrer v. Provident Mutual Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1931
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jane Heslinga Cook v. G.D. Searle & Co., Inc., Dr. Brian Donaldson, Dr. David E. BatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985