Legal Opinion
Jane Heslinga Cook v. G.D. Searle & Co., Inc., Dr. Brian Donaldson, Dr. David E. Bates
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 15, 1985No. 82-2021PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Chief Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Plaintiff, a resident of Iowa, commenced a diversity action in the District of Colorado, suing in tort for injuries allegedly caused by an intra-uterine device (IUD) manufactured by defendant, G.D. Searle & Co., Inc. In this suit she asserted a malpractice claim against…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Wade v. Danek Medical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Jenkins v. City of TopekaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Anderson Living Trust v. WPX Energy Production, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- Janet L. Vaught v. Showa Denko K.K.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BoellstorffCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.