Legal Opinion

Albert Lonzo Cantrell v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 19, 1969No. 614_1PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

Albert Lonzo Cantrell seeks leave to appeal in forma pauperis from the denial, without a hearing, by Senior District Judge Duncan of his third petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate his sentences. Except for the possible application of very recent United States Supreme Court cases, the matter is repetitious and borders on the frivolous. Nevertheless, we have examined the situation carefully.

The record discloses the following:

1. On July 25, 1966, in the Western District of Missouri, Cantrell, with retained counsel experienced in the criminal law, waived indictment and pleaded guilty to a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Halliday v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Henry Charles Cooks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  2. Robert C. Harris v. Dr. P. J. Ciccone, Director, Medical Center for Federal Prisoners, Springfield, MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  3. Robert E. Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  4. United States v. Carl BriscoeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  5. United States v. Ascension Soriano-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API