Legal Opinion
Cobarruviaz v. Maplebear, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 3, 2015No. Case No. 15-cv-00697-EMCPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Dominic Cobarruviaz brought this lawsuit on behalf of himself and a . putative class of former and current shoppers and grocery delivery drivers who work for Defendant Maplebear, Inc., which does business as Instacart (hereafter, Instacart). See Docket No. 17 (First Amended Complaint) (FAC). “Instacart is a shopping and delivery service that provides shoppers and delivery drivers who are dispatched through a mobile phone application to shop, purchase, and deliver…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Waffle House, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tanguilig v. Bloomingdale's, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Bynum v. Maplebear Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Bynum v. Maplebear Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Curtis v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Dominguez v. Stone Brewing Co., LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.