Legal Opinion
Curry v. D.A.L.L. Anointed, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 8, 2012No. 45A04-1106-CT-290PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KIRSCH, Judge.
Gladys E. Curry (“Gladys”) and her husband, Thomas Curry (“Thomas”)(eollee-tively “the Currys”), appeal from the trial court’s order dismissing their complaint for injuries and loss of consortium against D.A.L.L. Anointed, Inc. (“D.A.L.L.”). The Currys present several issues for our review, the folloving of which is dispositive: Whether the trial court erred by dismissing the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on the exclusivity provision of the Indiana Worker’s Compensation Act (“the Act”). 1
We affirm.
FACTS JJVD PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The facts that were…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- GKN Co. v. MagnessIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Perry v. Stitzer Buick GMC, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Noble, Etc. v. ZimmermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
- Ski World, Inc. v. FifeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Knoy v. Joe W.Indiana Supreme Court · 2004
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hood's Gardens, Inc. v. Jason Young, Craig Meade d/b/a Discount Tree Excavation a/k/a D & E Tree ExtractionIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Gaines v. Dist. of Columbia Dep't of Emp't Servs.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- City of Fort Wayne v. Southwest Allen County Fire Protection District and Tera K. Klutz, in her official capacity as Auditor of Allen County, IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- John C. Morris v. Custom Kitchen & BathsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Kimberly K. Robinson, in her official capacity as Trustee of Calumet Township, Indiana, and as a resident and taxpayer of Calumet Township v. Indiana Department of Local Government FinanceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.