Legal Opinion

Brocker Manufacturing & Supply Co. v. United Bonding & Insurance

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 9, 1973No. 483 C.D. 1972PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

This is an action by plaintiff subcontractor, Brocker Manufacturing and Supply Company, Inc., séeMng to recover reimbursement for steel reinforcing bars allegedly supplied to the prime contractor, Doral Construction Company, Inc. who used same in the construction of the Pine Creek Inflatable Dam. The defendant surety, United Bonding and Insurance Company, has raised Preliminary Objections to plaintiff subcontractor’s complaint asserting that (1) the Board of Arbitration of Claims is the only forum before which a claim of such a nature can be initially presented…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Armour Rentals, Inc. v. General State AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Alger-Rau & Associates, Inc. v. General State AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Faxon Land Co. v. Laubach, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County1956

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ezy Parks v. LarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Clark v. Pennsylvania State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Employers Ins. v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Vespaziani v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. Brayman Construction Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API