Legal Opinion
Clark v. Pennsylvania State Police
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 6, 1981No. 80-2-271PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIX, Justice.
The instant appeal arises from an alleged breach of an agreement on the part of the State Police to honor a promise to promote appellant to the position of Captain.
The uncontested pertinent facts are that Corporal Clark alleges that he secured an agreement from former Pennsylvania State Police Commissioner Urella that he would be promoted to the rank of Captain from that of Corporal upon his completion of legal training that appellant desired to pursue. In 1971, Clark received authorization, upon his request, to attend law school full time for three years in an extended…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- DeLuca v. Buckeye Coal CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Roth v. HartlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Strank v. Mercy Hospital of JohnstownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Mrahunec v. FaustiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Vespaziani v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Lackner v. GlosserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Allegheny Energy, Inc. v. Dqe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Ezy Parks v. LarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Scientific Games International, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Cimina v. BronichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.