Legal Opinion
People v. Subramanyan
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided February 29, 2016No. 30-2014-00752821PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1508Opinion
THE COURT.* —
Victim and appellant Craig Oden appeals the trial court’s order denying him further restitution. On appeal, Oden argues that the trial court erred by denying him restitution for the attorney’s fees he paid his civil lawyer. As explained below, Oden, as a crime victim, lacks standing to bring this appeal on his own. For this reason, we dismiss the appeal.
Factual and Procedural Background
On January 11, 2012, the district attorney on behalf of plaintiff, the People, filed a complaint against defendant and respondent Ganesh Subramanyan alleging that he was driving under the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. DehleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. HannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Abbott Labs. v. Superior Court of Orange Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Crump v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- (PC) Kohut v. MartinDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Abbott Laboratories v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.