(PC) Kohut v. Martin
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JONATHAN KOHUT, Case No. 1:22-cv-00472-HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS CASE1 14 M. MARTIN, et al., (Doc. No. 13) 15 Defendants. FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 16 17 Pending before the Court for screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A is Plaintiff’s First 18 Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 13, “FAC”). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned 19 recommends the district court dismiss the FAC because it fails to state any cognizable…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.