Legal Opinion

Saltzman v. Independence Blue Cross

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 5, 2009No. Civil Action 08-3849PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM RE: MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT

BAYLSON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Mark Saltzman and Jan Meister initiated the current civil action against Defendants Independence Blue Cross (“IBC”), QCC Insurance Company (“QCC”), and Keystone Health Plan East, Inc. (“KHPE”), alleging violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) and several state law claims. Presently before this Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint (Doc. 20).

After an extensive review of the Plan documents, considering the Third Circuit’s ERISA jurisprudence and the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Borreani v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
  2. COCKERILL v. CORTEVA, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API