Legal Opinion

COCKERILL v. CORTEVA, INC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 4, 2022No. 2:21-cv-03966Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBERT F. COCKERILL and CIVIL ACTION CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM NEWTON, individually and as representatives on NO. 21-3966 behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, v. CORTEVA, INC.; DUPONT SPECIALITY PRODUCTS USA, LLC; DUPONT DE NEMOURS, INC.; E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY; THE PENSION AND RETIREMENT PLAN; THE ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE MEMORANDUM RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS Baylson, J. August _4_, 2022 This putative class action arises from the alleged denial of retirement benefits to certain employees…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Harold Pinker, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Roche Holdings Ltd. Harold PinkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API