Legal Opinion
Gilmore v. Local 295, International Brotherhood of Teamsters
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 6, 1992No. 91 Civ. 1860 (GLG)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOETTEL, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
Andre Gilmore began working for Airborne Express, a subsidiary of Airborne Freight Corporation in October 1986 as a driver at the company’s facility in Portches-ter, N.Y. While he was employed at Airborne, he was a member of Local 295, the International Teamster’s Union shop representing Airborne’s drivers.
Procedures for hiring, terminating and disciplining Union employees at Airborne are governed by a collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”) between the company and Local 295. The agreement contains a Progressive Disciplinary System that provides for…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Daniel v. T & M Protection Resources, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Dortz v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Bridges v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Deans v. Kennedy House, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Senecal v. B.G. Lenders Service LLCDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.