Legal Opinion

Fenton v. Scott

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1888PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the county of Lane.

1Opinion of the CourtLord, J.

This was a proceeding under the provisions of title 4, chapter 14, sections 2544-2548, Oregon Code, to contest the right of the defendant to the office of county judge of Lane County, to which he was declared elected by the board of canvassers of said county.

Without adverting to the pleadings, it is sufficient to say the contest proved adverse to the contestant, and it is from the judgment rendered therein that this appeal is brought.

There are but two questions presented by this record, or in fact earnestly urged by counsel for the contestant, which we shall deem it necessary to consider. One…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Dailey v. . LivingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. O'Gorman v. RichterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Board of CanvassersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Howser v. PepperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Witham v. McNuttOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Hughes v. HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Williamson v. MusickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API