Legal Opinion

Incorporated Village of North Hornell v. Rauber

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1943PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Voobhis, J.

The action is to terminate a sawmill built and operated by defendant Edwin- N. Bauber upon leased land, in the village of North Hornell, Steuben County, New York. Defendants Wells, owners of the land, have consented to the granting of the relief prayed for in the complaint. Bauber, who has answered and contests the action, is in rightful occupation, according to the complaint, which states that he is the lessee in possession of the land and the owner of the buildings, machinery, tools and equipment now located thereon, The mill is near the edge of the village and adjoins land owned by New…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Marcus v. Village of MamaroneckNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Lincoln Trust Co. v. Williams Building Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Matter of 440 E. 102nd St. Corp. v. MurdockNew York Court of Appeals · 1941

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bobandal Realties, Inc. v. WorthingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  2. People v. MarkovitzCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1979
  3. O'MARA v. Council of the City of NewarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Ruby v. Carlisle Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Bobandal Realties Inc. v. WorthingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API