Legal Opinion

Wilbon v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided March 26, 1997No. 07-95-0375-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYD, Justice.

In a point of error contending that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel during the punishment hearing, appellant challenges his punishment of 27 years confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, assessed after his murder conviction. The thrust of his attack is that the trial court reversibly erred in refusing to permit his counsel to argue a supplemental charge on the parole law given after the jury had retired to begin its punishment deliberations. Disagreeing with his contentions, we affirm the judgment of the trial…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Stoker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Ramirez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. McGee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Arnold v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001
  2. Roberson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  3. Daniel Uballe v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2014
  4. Michael Winn LaFleur v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2002
  5. Moreno v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API