Legal Opinion

Daniel Uballe v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided May 6, 2014No. 07-13-00127-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRIAN QUINN, Chief Justice.

Appellant Daniel Uballe was convicted of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance (cocaine) and sentenced to sixty years confinement. On appeal, he contends the trial court erred in 1) failing to suppress the results of a search of his vehicle under both the federal and state constitutions, 2) failing to submit an article 38.23 instruction, 3) refusing to grant a hearing on purported jury misconduct, 4) refusing to grant a hearing on his motion for new trial, and 5) refusing to grant a new trial based on jury misconduct. We affirm the judgment.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Florida v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hankston, Gareic JerardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
  2. William Adrian Roberts v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014
  3. Jeffrey Ray Cox v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015
  4. Jorge Zepeda v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2015
  5. Marc Anthony Rayos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API