Legal Opinion
Fairmont Foods Co. v. City of Duluth
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 16, 1961No. 38,204PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
Action for declaratory judgment that an ordinance of the city of Duluth is unconstitutional and for an order enjoining the city officials *324from refusing to issue plaintiff a license permitting, it to sell milk in the city.
The court found that the ordinance did not violate the constitution and refused to issue the injunction and thereafter denied in part plaintiff’s motion for amended findings or for a new trial. Plaintiff appeals from that order.
The U. S. Public Health Service developed a model milk ordinance and code for states and communities which Duluth, Minneapolis, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Dean Milk Co. v. City of MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. Wrightwood Dairy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Larson v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Otto Milk Company v. RoseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
3Cited by8 opinions
- Arcadia Development Corp. v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- State v. HylandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. PerrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Holt v. City of Sauk RapidsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. Northern Raceway Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.