Legal Opinion
Otto Milk Company v. Rose
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 5, 1953No. Appeal, 48PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Horace Stern,
This is an action of mandamus to compel the City of Johnstown by its officers and agents to issue to plaintiff, Otto Milk Company, a permit to sell milk within the city. The case was tried by agreement before the court without a jury as a result of which the court below entered judgment for defendants. Prom that judgment plaintiff appeals.
Plaintiff’s complaint averred that it is a Pennsylvania corporation with its principal place of business in Pittsburgh, that it is engaged in the sale and distribution of milk wholesale in paper containers, that it is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dean Milk Co. v. City of MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- State Ex Rel. Larson v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Grant v. Leavell, Director of HealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
- Sheffield Farms Co., Inc. v. SeamanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- City of Wewoka v. Rose Lawn DairySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Warren v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Commonwealth v. SterlaceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Cabell's, Incorporated v. City of NacogdochesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Fairmont Foods Co. v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Commonwealth ex rel. Allegheny County v. ShenotSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.