Legal Opinion
Leshinsky v. Telvent GIT, S.A.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 1, 2013No. 10 Civ. 4511 (JPO)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge:
Plaintiff Phillip Leshinsky brought this action against Defendants Telvent GIT, *436S.A. (“Telvent GIT”), Telvent Farradyne, Inc. (“Farradyne”), Telvent Caseta, Inc. (“Caseta”), Glenn Deitiker, and Alfredo Escriba (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging whistleblower claims under Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”), codified at 18 U.S.C. § 1514A(a) (“Section 806” or “Section 1514A”), as amended by Section 929A of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, Pub.L. No. 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Staub v. Proctor HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Elizabeth Gordon v. New York City Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Kuhns v. LedgerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Ashmore v. CGI Group Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Yang v. Navigators Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Vista Outdoor Inc. v. Reeves Family TrustDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Feldman v. Law Enforcement Associates Corp.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2013
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.