Legal Opinion

Huff v. Brantley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1881PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The act of 1875 requiring bills of exception to be tendered within sixty days from the date of the decision in the event the court does not adjourn within thirty days from the time it convened, does not authorize delay in tendering to more than thirty days after the adjournment, though within sixty days from the decision. The law. as found in section 4252 of Code, applies to such cases, and the act of 1875 will be construed so as to accelerate the review of cases ‘¡tied at sessions which last more than thirty days. — See Forsyth vs. Preer, Illges & Co., September term, 1879.

Practice in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Forsyth v. Preer, Illges & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1879

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. Dietz v. FahySupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Birmingham Finance Co. v. ChisholmSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  4. Durrell v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  5. Wilson v. DobbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API