Legal Opinion

Birmingham Finance Co. v. Chisholm

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 13, 1926No. 5191PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gilbert, J.,

1. “The law embodied in the Civil Code, § 6152, does not in any case authorize delay in tendering to a trial judge a bill of exceptions alleging error in a judgment rendered during a given term, for more than thirty days after the final adjournment of the court for that term. Forsyth v. Preer, 64 Ga. 281; Huff v. Brantley, 66 Ga. 599; Dietz v. Fahy, 107 Ga. 325 (33 S. E. 51) ; Carter v. Johnson, 112 Ga. 494 (2) (37 S. E. 736); Heery v. Burkhalter, 113 Ga. 1043 (39 S. E. 406) ; Crawford v. Goodwin, 128 Ga. 134 (2) (57 S. E. 240) ; Brandon v. Akers, 134 Ga. 78 (3) (67 S. E. 540).”…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Crawford v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Heery v. BurkhalterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. First National Bank v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  4. Grant v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  5. Dietz v. FahySupreme Court of Georgia · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Beavers v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  2. Durrell v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  3. Parrish v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  4. Whiteman v. Federal Land BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  5. Taylor v. Cleghorn Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API