Legal Opinion

Dietz v. Fahy

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 21, 1899PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Motion to dismiss writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, P. J.

This case was tried at a term of the city court of Floyd county which did not adjourn within thirty days from the beginning thereof. The bill of exceptions, though ■tendered within sixty days of the decision complained of, was not tendered until after the expiration of more than thirty •days from the final adjournment of the court for that term. It follows, under section 5539 of the Civil Code, which embraces the provisions of the act of February 25, 1875, amending section 4252 of the Code of 1873, and prescribing the time within which bills of exceptions shall be tendered (Acts of 1875, p.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Forsyth v. Preer, Illges & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  2. Huff v. BrantleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1881

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Crawford v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Heery v. BurkhalterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. First National Bank v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  4. Birmingham Finance Co. v. ChisholmSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  5. Carter v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API