Caminetti v. Edward Brown & Sons
California Supreme Court
1DissentCarter, J.
I dissent.
The question, as the majority opinion states, is whether the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to grant appel*518lant a new trial under section 953e of the Code of Civil Procedure upon the ground that the death of the reporter made it impossible to secure a reporter’s transcript. In concluding that the record fails to show an abuse of discretion, the majority have, in my opinion, countenanced a procedure and application of the statute which render it meaningless and ineffective.
In January, 1936, in the course of liquidation of Union Indemnity Company, an insolvent Louisiana…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Waybright v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Banta v. SillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Diamond v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.