Legal Opinion · Dissent

Caminetti v. Edward Brown & Sons

California Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1943No. S. F. 16724Published

1DissentCarter, J.

I dissent.

The question, as the majority opinion states, is whether the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to grant appel*518lant a new trial under section 953e of the Code of Civil Procedure upon the ground that the death of the reporter made it impossible to secure a reporter’s transcript. In concluding that the record fails to show an abuse of discretion, the majority have, in my opinion, countenanced a procedure and application of the statute which render it meaningless and ineffective.

In January, 1936, in the course of liquidation of Union Indemnity Company, an insolvent Louisiana…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Waybright v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Banta v. SillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Diamond v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API