Chung Shin v. Shalala
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILLIAMS, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment. With an opposition having been filed by Plaintiff Chung Shin (“Shin”) and a reply filed by Defendant, the motion is ripe for resolution. No hearing is deemed necessary. See Local Rule 105.6 (D.Md.). Upon consideration of the motion and opposition thereto, and for the reasons stated below, the Court will treat Defendant’s motion as a Motion for Summary Judgment and grant said motion.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, Chung Shin, is a Korean-American man…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by167 opinions
- Tawwaab v. Virginia Linen Service, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2010
- J.E. Dunn Constraction Co. v. S.R.P. Development Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
- McFeeley v. Jackson Street Entertainment, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Bradshaw v. Hilco Receivables, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Gionfriddo v. Jason Zink, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
162 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.