Gold Line Refining, Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HEWITT, Judge.
Plaintiff, Gold Line Refining, Ltd. (“Gold Line”) seeks damages resulting from the use of an unauthorized economic price adjust-*292merit clause1 in its contract to supply jet fuel to the United States of America, acting through the Defense Fuel Supply Center (“DFSC” or the “government”).2 Plaintiff advances several theories of recovery: quantum meruit, reformation or other equitable relief allowed under the Contract Disputes Act, including contract reformation for mutual mistake, and contract reformation for unilateral mistake. Defendant moves to dismiss pursuant to Rules…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Trauma Service Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Beta Systems, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Doe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Hermes Consolidated, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Hermes Consolidated, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Gold Line Refining, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Barrett Refining Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.