Legal Opinion
Ferguson v. Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 19, 2009No. Civil Action 08-1030 (JDB)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Plaintiff Michelle Ferguson brings this action against defendants Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (‘WMATA”) and Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union and three of its employees, sued in their official capacities only (together “Local 689”). WMATA discharged Ferguson from her position as a bus driver after her bus hit and killed a pedestrian. Ferguson alleges that WMATA discharged her without sufficient cause, in violation of its collective bargaining agreement with Local 689. She further alleges that Local 689 breached its duty of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Peart v. Latham and Watkins LLPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Hubert PHILOGENE, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Et Al., DefendantsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- American Federation of Government Employees, Local 2741 v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Price v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Turner v. WASH. METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTH.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.