Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Thompson
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 9, 1996No. F022427PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THAXTER, J.
The trial court vacated a renewal of judgment which set forth that Edward Wayne Thompson (respondent) owed the County of Stanislaus (County) $4,694.17 in child support arrears, finding that the County was estopped from collecting additional principal or interest after January 1994 under the principles of equitable estoppel and accord and satisfaction. Mrs. Thompson, by the County (collectively appellant), challenges the ruling. We will conclude there is no evidence supporting either accord and satisfaction or estoppel and will accordingly reverse.
Facts and Procedural History
C…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Golden West Baseball Co. v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Conderback, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Moving Picture MacHine Operators Union Local No. 162 v. Glasgow Theaters, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Schwartz v. California Claim Service, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Hair v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Michaelian v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- FIDELITY CREDITOR SERVICE, INC. v. BrowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Pierce Lathing Co. v. Isec, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Witaschek v. Sacramento County Bureau of Family Support (In Re Witaschek)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2002
- Woolridge v. J.F.L. Electric, Inc.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.