Legal Opinion

Vereb v. Markowitz

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 8, 1954No. Appeals, 274PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Chidsey,

The plaintiff, Michael J. Yereb, instituted this action in trespass as administrator of the estate of his son, Richard T. Vereb, deceased, to recover damages under the Wrongful Death and Survival Acts occasioned when Richard was fatally injured as the result of being struck by two automobiles driven respectively by the defendant, James Markowitz, and the defendant, Robert A. Peters. A jury returned verdicts against both of these defendants in the amount of $1,700 under the Wrongful Death Act and $5,000 under the Survival Act. The court entered a compulsory…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dahlstrom v. ShrumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Majewski v. LempkaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Londrino v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Wermeling v. SHATTUCKSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. Yoder CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Connolly v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Potere v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Sherman v. Manufacturers Light & Heat Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Haddigan v. HarkinsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API