Legal Opinion

Londrino v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 1, 1954No. Appeal, No. 73PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

This appeal by the plaintiff beneficiary of a life insurance policy is from a judgment for the defendant insurance company entered on a jury’s verdict in its favor upon trial of an action brought to recover on the policy for the alleged death of the insured, the beneficiary’s husband. The trial was notably free of harmful error and no complaint is made of the learned trial judge’s submission of the case to the jury. The sole error here assigned is that the court en banc abused its discretion in failing to grant the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial on the ground…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones Et Vir v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Decker v. KuleszaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Kiser v. SchlosserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Segriff v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Sherman v. Manufacturers Light & Heat Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Mineo v. Eureka Security Fire & Marine InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Brown v. McLean Trucking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API