Legal Opinion

State v. Pettit

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 18, 1984No. 10-81-08399; CA A26707PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for sodomy in the first degree. ORS 163.405. The issues are whether the trial court erred in: (1) granting a protective order under ORS 135.873(1); (2) denying defendant’s challenge of a juror for cause; and (3) permitting an expert witness to testify on matters touching on the credibility of the victim. We affirm.

The victim is defendant’s daughter, who was 8 years old at the time of the alleged crime and 10 years old at the time of trial. After indictment, defendant moved for discovery. ORS 135.815. The state moved for a protective order against disclosing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. McLeanOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State v. MegordenOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  4. State v. RathieOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Lambert v. Sisters of St. Joseph of PeaceOregon Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SpigaroloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Commonwealth v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. State v. J.Q.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  4. State v. WixomCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. State v. DaleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API