Legal Opinion

State v. Dale

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 2, 1985No. C84-07-32926; CA A34253PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for sodomy and sexual abuse, both in the first degree. The issue is whether the trial court erred in admitting the testimony of a Children’s Services Division child abuse specialist concerning the reaction of a typical five to seven-year-old sexual abuse victim. We affirm.

The victim was defendant’s daughter. She was between the ages of five and seven when the incidents of abuse occurred. Defendant’s defense was that, because she had been raised in a sexually permissive manner and had been exposed to some sexually explicit materials, she possessed enough…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. PettitCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. State v. MunroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. State v. PadillaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HudnallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. RemmeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. State v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API