Legal Opinion

State v. J.Q.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 14, 1991PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

LONG, J.A.D.

I

We are called upon here to determine the extent to which expert evidence may be utilized in a child sex abuse case to *15shore up a victim-witness’s testimony. Defendant, J.Q., who was convicted of a series of sex crimes against his young daughters, N.Q. and C.Q., claims that he was denied a fair trial because of the improper admission of expert testimony which bolstered the credibility of the children.1 At issue is the admission of testimony as to the Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome (CSAAS), other so-called syndrome evidence and…

2Cases cited107 opinions

  1. State v. Edward Charles L.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. State v. MacOnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  4. In re Nicole V.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. State v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State v. ForetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. State v. PapasavvasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  3. State v. J.Q.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  4. Steward v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. Anthony K. Cole (076255) (Middlesex and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API