Legal Opinion

Littles v. Lieberman

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 7, 1988No. Misc. 88-0083PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.

This is a non-core bankruptcy proceeding involving tort claims. I have before me RECOMMENDED OPINION CONTAINING PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW submitted to me by Order dated February 12, 1988 of United States Bankruptcy Judge David A. Scholl in Bankruptcy No. 87-00092S, Adversary No. 87-02394S, 90 B.R. 669. This matter was submitted to me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(c)(1) for entry of a final order. I have also before me DEFENDANT ARNOLD R. LIEBERMAN’S OBJECTIONS TO PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW filed March…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  5. Lockwood v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Anthes v. Transworld Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1991
  2. Fleet v. United States Consumer Council, Inc. (In Re Fleet)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Koresko v. Chase Manhattan Financial Services, Inc. (In Re Koresko)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Laubach v. Arrow Service Bureau, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  5. In Re Craft Architectural Metals Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API