NIGHTENGALE v. Timmel
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
W. JONES, Justice.
I. Nature of the Case
Janet Bell Nightengale brought a medical malpractice action against Dr. Kevin Timmel, an emergency room doctor who treated her in July 2007. Dr. Timmel failed to diagnose a clot in one of Nightengale’s vascular arteries. That condition cut off circulation to Nightengale’s left arm, eventually requiring its amputation above the elbow. At trial, the jury returned a special verdict finding that Dr. Timmel had not breached the relevant standard of care in his treatment of Nightengale.
Nightengale appeals that verdict, arguing the trial court erred in: (1)…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ross v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Myers v. Workmen's Auto InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- Cortez Ex Rel. Estate of Puentes v. HCCI-San Antonio, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. HairstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. Erik Virgil HallIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
- Easterling v. Kendall, M.D.Idaho Supreme Court · 2016
- Rita Hoagland v. Ada CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
- Sheets v. BofA / Countrywide Home LoansIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
- John Doe v. Shoshone-Bannock TribesIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.