Legal Opinion

NIGHTENGALE v. Timmel

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 2011No. 37226PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. JONES, Justice.

I. Nature of the Case

Janet Bell Nightengale brought a medical malpractice action against Dr. Kevin Timmel, an emergency room doctor who treated her in July 2007. Dr. Timmel failed to diagnose a clot in one of Nightengale’s vascular arteries. That condition cut off circulation to Nightengale’s left arm, eventually requiring its amputation above the elbow. At trial, the jury returned a special verdict finding that Dr. Timmel had not breached the relevant standard of care in his treatment of Nightengale.

Nightengale appeals that verdict, arguing the trial court erred in: (1)…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ross v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Myers v. Workmen's Auto InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Cortez Ex Rel. Estate of Puentes v. HCCI-San Antonio, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. HairstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. Erik Virgil HallIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Easterling v. Kendall, M.D.Idaho Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Rita Hoagland v. Ada CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Sheets v. BofA / Countrywide Home LoansIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  5. John Doe v. Shoshone-Bannock TribesIdaho Supreme Court · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API